COP 19 was hosted by Poland at Warsaw. As an environmentalist or perhaps anyone who has been following environment over the past few years would realise that the overt enthusiasm on climate change issues has developed into casual lip service and finally in today’s world, the entire climate change debate has reduced to an exercise in profit making. No wonder the climate change conferences have witnessed walkouts and impressive rhetoric but very little concrete action.
The Like-Minded Developing Countries (LMDG) such as Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Bolivia, Malaysia, China, India, Cuba, Nicaragua, Ecuador and Thailand wished to have strict separation between developed and developing countries responsibility in tackling climate change and a return to the principle of common but differentiated responsibility.
The developed nations on the other hand argue that China and India are growing so fast that by 2020 the countries greenhouse gas emissions will be lot higher than the world’s and therefore they need to shoulder responsibility.
Another aspect that took the limelight was the issue of climate extremes triggered by climate change. The Poor countries desired funds from rich countries because rich countries are the ones responsible for climate change and poor countries are the ones to bear the brunt of extreme disasters because of them. The Typhoon Haiyan that wrecked havoc in Philippines recently brought the extreme events issue into limelight.
But Developed countries are masters and very skilled at passing responsibility (they have been doing it for years) and besides even China and India would also have to bear responsibility as their GDP is not low so the issue died.
REDD+ negotiations have been ongoing since 2005, and finally at this COP, the participating nations agreed for REDD+ mechanism. UK, Norway and USA have already allocated $US280 million to a World Bank-led fund operating REDD projects.
At the core issue (as always is), was the money matters. Developed countries had promised $100 billion dollar fund for developing countries by the end of 2020. The developing countries wanted some cash in the meantime (2013-19): but this demand was rejected in Warsaw talk.
Now coming to India’s position at COP-19 Warsaw;
India reiterated a return to CBDR (Common but Differentiated Responsibility). It called for allowing greater flexibility for developing countries to choose how they wish to combat climate change. India also slammed the practise of rich nations (indirectly pointing at USA) to treat global warming issues with a business perspective for providing markets to their MNCs.
India reiterated that developing nations are not as evasive as rich nations try to portray them.
India also pointed out that simply creating institutional arrangements like Green Climate Fund does not help because there are no clear guidelines as to how the rich nations will cough up the required amount.
India also wants HFC to be covered under UNFCCC so developing countries have ample time to adjust while richer nations want it to be covered under Montreal protocol. And this is not because suddenly USA’s conscience is poking it but simply because it would mean more market for their MNC firms (in short US firms get richer and India, China have to purchase expensive technology from them.)
Key Outcomes of Warsaw COP-
Each country to come up with national plans will be called “intended nationally determined contributions”.
Disaster victims in developing country will receive aid from the developed countries. BUT it will not be linked with any liability /commitment.
Merely urged developed nations to set “increasing levels” of aid to poor countries. No specific targets for 2013-19.
No mechanism on how $100 billion will magically appear in 2020.
No funding to poor countries for 2013-19 period.
The conference saw staged walkouts by more than 800 NGOs because developed countries are reducing climate conferences to sham and corporate interests are getting preference over climate change issues. But are the responsible nations ashamed? I don’t think so.